Jean-Charles Sournia is both an eminent French historian and Vice President
of the French Government's Commission on Alcohol. A history of alcoholism
is the English translation of his ambitious attempt to chronicle
how attitudes toward the excessive consumption of alcohol have changed
through time. Both the structure of this book and its point of view reflect
the author's dual perspective. While the first two sections of the book
present a more or less narrative account of the history of the subject
up to 1950, the third section largely an explication of enlightened late
twentieth century views. Sournia is well aware of the limitations of these
views. Nonetheless he writes both as an historian and
as an advocate of what he regards as humane non-judgmental contemporary
approaches to the problems of excessive drinking.
A history of alcoholism is inevitably a history of the shifting boundary
between moral and medical or scientific attitudes toward excessive drinking.
As Roy Porter comments in his introduction to Sournia's book, many
recent historians have adopted a skeptical and even hostile stance toward
the motives behind efforts at "medicalization." Sournia does
not engage in this kind of analysis. His book is not, however, an
argument for the power of medicine either.While Sournia accepts the idea
that alcoholism is a disease, he insists that it is not a "disease like
any other." Had it been, he argues, Western society might have come to
terms with it. Sournia does accept the popular contemporary
view of alcoholism as complex bio-psycho-social problem. This vantage
point has the virtue of allowing him to see medical history
against the background of the social, economic and political factors involved
in controlling the production and consumption of alcohol.
The first section of the book covers the nineteen centuries before 1850.
While necessarily sketchy, it is broad in scope. Among many other
things, Sournia briefly mentions a number of drink-related incidents in
the Bible, pauses to speculate on the role of alcohol in the death of Alexander
the Great, sketches the spread of distilled drinks through Europe, and
indicates the views of early medical writers such as Rush and Trotter.
If a theme ties this overview together it is Sournia's
observation of the limited role medical thought played in early approaches
to excessive drinking.
In his second section Sournia looks much more closely at the
period from 1850 to 1950. He begins with a chapter on Magnus Huss, who
coined the word alcoholism in 1849 and whose work ushered in the era of
intensive medical scrutiny of excessive drinking. Following this he wisely
chooses to treat the complex ideas and events of the period both
thematically and chronologically with separate chapters on drinking habits,
medical ideas, temperance efforts and the interaction between late nineteenth
century medical thought and the tremendous anxiety that was felt
over the role of alcohol in corrupting Western society.
The final section of his book is devoted to recent efforts to acheive an
adequate understanding of and treatment for alcoholism. Here
his book reads, at times, less like history and more
like a review of the literature on enlightened approaches to the many problems
created by alcohol. His review of late twentieth century views is
judicious and balanced though some doctors might take issue with him on
certain points. American readers might also feel
that he doesn't give sufficient credit to the tremendous impact of
self help groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous.
Sournia's ability
to cover a great span of time coherently and lucidly, as well
as to consider variations between different countries and religions is
truly remarkable. Because of its comprehensive scope and attention to detail
this book will serve as a useful orienting reference for those
planning to make more detailed studies in the history of alcoholism. As
a French historian he understandably pays more attention to
his own country than to others, but this should be a benefit to readers
of this English translation. While his identification with the currently
popular bio-psycho-social point of view leads him to make a
number of unhistorical judgments as, for example, when he dismisses
nineteenth century biological theories as "simplistic," it also allows
him to insist on the complexity of the unsolved problem of excessive drinking.
Overall the combination of Sournia's commitment to humane,
non-judgmental approaches to alcohol related problems with his
scholarly, lucid, and well translated, prose make this a book well
worth reading.
Edward M. Brown
Brown University, Providence R.I.