TALKS

- interviews
-
invited lectures
- visiting scholar

Interviews

 

Philosophy Talk. San Francisco's KALW Public Radio.

Topic: Gender
Jan. 4, 2005.

Listen to the show.

 

Introduction:

Are gender roles and differences fixed, once and for, all by biology? Or is gender socially constructed and culturally variable? How does gender differ from sex? Join Stanford Professors John Perry and Ken Taylor as they explore with Dr. Fausto-Sterling whether men and women are really from different planets after all.

 

"A Conversation with Anne Fausto-Sterling: Exploring what makes us male or female" by Claudia Dreifus, New York Times, January 2, 2001

 

 

Excerpts from Q&A:

In the academic world, Dr. Fausto-Sterling is known as a developmental biologist who offers interesting counterpoints to the view that the role division between men and women is largely predetermined by evolution.
"When people say 'it's nurture' or 'it's nature' in making us male or female, I take the middle ground and say that it's a combination of both," she said. "That's not a popular position to take in today's academic environment, but it is the one that makes the most sense."

Q. What can we learn about gender from examining how the medical profession treats infants born with ambiguous genitalia? These are children who were once called "hermaphrodites," and whom you would prefer we term "intersexuals."

A. From them, we can literally see how society's ideas about male and female are constructed. When infants with ambiguous genitalia are born, everyone -- parents, doctors -- are very upset and the physicians often suggest drastic surgeries to assign a specific gender to the child. The regimen usually involves the doctors' deciding what sex the child ought to be. Then, they surgically reconstruct the patient to conform to that diagnosis: body parts are taken out, others are added, hormones are given, or taken away.
In the end, the doctors take a body that was clearly neither male or female and turn it into one they can represent to the world as "male" or "female."...My point is that there's greater human variation than supposed. My political point is that we can afford to lighten up about what it means to be male or female. We should definitely lighten up on those who fall in between because there are a lot of them.

Q. What do you think nature is telling us by making intersexuals?
A. That nature is not an ideal state. It is filled with imperfections and developmental variation. We have all these Aristotelian categories of male and female. Nature doesn't have them. Nature creates a whole lot of different forms.


Brown University // Providence, Rhode Island 02912 // 401.863.1000
Last update: 8/20/2007